Alicia Andrews, the woman identified as the fifth defendant connected to the killing of rapper Julio Foolio, is once again drawing widespread attention as her legal future remains uncertain months after her conviction.

Although Andrews was found guilty in October 2025, she has still not officially been sentenced — and a dramatic courtroom development is now raising even more questions about what could happen next.

The case is tied to the death of Charles Jones, better known as Julio Foolio, whose killing became one of the most heavily discussed criminal cases online. Prosecutors accused Andrews and her former boyfriend, Isaiah Chance, of acting as principals in a first-degree murder case connected to Jones’ death.

However, Andrews was tried separately from the other defendants. During the trial, prosecutors attempted to convince jurors that she played a role serious enough to support a first-degree murder conviction. But after hearing the evidence, the jury chose a lesser charge instead.

Discover more
Sports
SPORT

Rather than convicting her of first-degree murder, jurors ultimately found Andrews guilty of manslaughter.

That verdict significantly changed the direction of the case. Under Florida law, manslaughter carries a much lower maximum sentence than first-degree murder. While a first-degree murder conviction could have resulted in life-altering penalties, manslaughter in this situation carries a potential maximum sentence of 15 years in prison.

At the time of the verdict, many expected Andrews to move quickly into the sentencing phase. But just before sentencing could take place, the case took another unexpected turn.

According to the latest update surrounding the case, Judge Cisco — the judge originally overseeing Andrews’ proceedings — was removed after allegations of bias surfaced. The claims immediately created controversy and forced the court process into uncertainty.

Because of that development, Andrews has remained unsentenced despite already being convicted for months.

Now, a newly assigned judge has stepped into the case, but Andrews’ legal team is not simply preparing for sentencing. Instead, her attorneys are aggressively pushing for a completely new trial.

The defense reportedly argues that the alleged bias connected to the previous judge may have affected the fairness of the proceedings. As a result, they are asking the court to throw out the previous process and allow Andrews another chance before a jury.

A major hearing is expected to take place on Friday, May 22. During that hearing, the new judge is expected to decide whether Andrews should receive a new trial or proceed directly to sentencing based on the existing manslaughter conviction.

That hearing is now becoming one of the most closely watched developments connected to the Julio Foolio case.

But one legal detail is drawing especially strong attention online.

According to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.640, even if Andrews is granted a new trial, prosecutors reportedly would not be able to retry her on the more serious charge of first-degree murder. Because the original jury already rejected that charge and instead convicted her of manslaughter, any future retrial would be limited to manslaughter only.

For many people following the case, that detail dramatically changes the stakes.

If the new trial request is denied, Andrews could soon finally learn her sentence after months of delays. But if the request is approved, the courtroom battle surrounding the fifth defendant in the Julio Foolio case may be far from over.

As the May 22 hearing approaches, online discussion surrounding Andrews continues intensifying, with many now waiting to see whether the case is about to move toward sentencing — or back into another major legal fight.