Two Arrested, Three Still Missing: Why the DJ Warras Case Is Far From Over

When news broke that two people had been arrested in connection with the killing of DJ Warras, many believed the investigation had finally reached a turning point.

But within hours, police delivered a statement that shifted the entire narrative.

The two suspects now in custody, investigators confirmed, are not the individuals seen on the CCTV footage from the scene of the murder.

And just like that, the case became more complicated — and far more unsettling.

The Arrests That Raised More Questions Than Answers

According to police, the arrests were made following what they described as “other compelling evidence” gathered during the investigation. While authorities have not yet disclosed the nature of that evidence, they were clear on one point: the two accused do not match the three individuals captured on CCTV near the location where DJ Warras was killed.

That distinction matters.

In most high-profile homicide cases, CCTV footage often becomes the backbone of the prosecution’s case — a visual anchor that helps the public understand who investigators are focused on. Here, however, police appear to be pursuing multiple lines of inquiry simultaneously, suggesting a far wider network of involvement.

In other words, the arrests may represent progress — but not closure.

Who Are the Three People on CCTV?

Police have confirmed that three individuals visible in CCTV footage remain unidentified and at large. While no images have yet been officially released to the public, investigators have made it clear that these figures are of significant interest.

What’s troubling is the implication:
If the people on camera are not the ones arrested, what role did they play?

Were they witnesses who fled?

Were they facilitators, not the attackers?

Or are they central suspects yet to be identified?

For now, police are not saying — but their insistence that the CCTV figures remain a priority suggests these individuals are far from irrelevant.

“Other Compelling Evidence”: What Could That Mean?

The phrase has sparked intense speculation.

In legal terms, “other compelling evidence” can refer to a range of materials, including:

cellphone records or location data

forensic evidence not visible to the public

witness statements or confidential informants

digital communications recovered after the incident

Crucially, it may also point to evidence linking the accused to planning or instigation, rather than the physical act captured on camera.

This opens the door to a disturbing possibility:
That DJ Warras’ killing may not have been spontaneous — but orchestrated.

Protection Orders: A Chilling Detail Re-Emerges

Adding another layer of complexity is confirmation that protection orders had been taken out prior to DJ Warras’ death.

While police have not clarified who sought the orders or against whom, investigators have acknowledged that these legal measures may now be relevant to the case.

Protection orders typically indicate:

prior threats or intimidation

ongoing disputes or fear of harm

documented concern about personal safety

If these orders are formally introduced in court, they could establish motive, forewarning, or escalation, dramatically altering how the case is understood.

What Happens Next in Court

The two accused are expected to appear in court on Wednesday, 24 December 2025, where more details may finally enter the public record.

At this stage, several outcomes are possible:

charges may be formally outlined

bail may be contested

timelines of events may be clarified

links to other suspects could be hinted at

However, police have cautioned that the court appearance will not mark the end of the investigation — a rare but telling admission.

A Case That Refuses to Settle

For fans, colleagues, and loved ones of DJ Warras, the uncertainty has been agonising.

The arrest of two suspects offered momentary relief — quickly replaced by a deeper unease when it became clear that key figures are still unaccounted for.

Investigators continue to stress patience, insisting that more information will emerge in due course. But the reality remains stark:
three people seen near the scene are still out there, and police believe they matter.

Why This Investigation Feels Different

What sets the DJ Warras case apart isn’t just the tragedy of the crime — it’s the fragmented puzzle investigators are trying to assemble.

Arrests without CCTV matches.
Evidence without public explanation.
Protection orders without disclosed context.

Each piece suggests a larger, more tangled story — one that may involve multiple roles, shifting loyalties, and concealed motives.

“This Case Is Far From Over”

Those words, echoed by police and prosecutors alike, are not routine.

They are a warning.

As the court date approaches and the manhunt for the CCTV suspects continues, one thing is clear: the version of events the public currently knows is incomplete.

And when the missing pieces finally fall into place, the truth behind DJ Warras’ death may prove far more complex — and far more disturbing — than anyone first imagined.