New evidence and chilling details have emerged in the aftermath of the tragic killing of South African media personality DJ Warras, leaving the public asking whether his death was not only violent, but foretold. In the days before he was shot dead in broad daylight in Johannesburg’s CBD, there are now claims that DJ Warras had been warned — ominously — that he had only seven days left to live.

While authorities have not confirmed every detail, multiple reports indicate that Warras had received death threats in the days leading up to his shooting, prompting him to obtain protection orders against several individuals. These threats were said to be connected to his work involving a controversially hijacked building, which his security company was attempting to secure.

According to news outlets covering the case, DJ Warras was no stranger to danger in the weeks before his death. He had reportedly joked about his own mortality online, reflecting unease about escalating risks — only for that grim humor to become hauntingly real days later.

On December 16, 2025, Warrick “DJ Warras” Stock was shot outside the Zambezi Building in the heart of Johannesburg. Police say a short man with dreadlocks approached him and opened fire before fleeing the scene. The killing sparked nationwide shock due to its boldness and timing.

What makes the story even more disturbing is the timeline of threats leading up to the fatal day. Authorities revealed that Warras had secured five protection orders against individuals allegedly linked to the building’s unlawful occupation — a clear sign he knew his life might be at risk.

Social media users have since dug into Warras’ digital footprint, uncovering posts and remarks where he hinted that someone might want him dead. One recurring phrase — “Tryna get me killed” — began circulating widely after his murder, reigniting debate about whether Warras felt in danger before the attack.

Despite the emerging narrative of forewarning, police maintain that the official motive is still under investigation. While a suspect has been identified and is expected to be arrested soon, authorities have not publicly linked any specific threat directly to the fatal shooting.

What is clear, however, is that DJ Warras’ death has exposed uncomfortable truths about crime, security, and vulnerability — especially for those who speak out or take action in the face of organised, violent elements. Online reactions to the case remain intense, with some arguing Warras was targeted for his activism and involvement in reclaiming hijacked urban property, while others call attention to the broader climate of lawlessness that may have contributed to his demise.

As the investigation continues, the idea that DJ Warras was warned about his death days before it happened adds a haunting layer to an already tragic event. It also raises deeper questions about the intersection of public life, personal safety, and the very real consequences of confronting powerful, entrenched forces.

In a country grappling with rising violent crime and high-profile killings, DJ Warras’ case has become more than a single tragedy — it’s a stark reminder that fear, foresight, and fatal outcomes can sometimes intersect in the most shocking ways imaginable.