Insider says signs are looking “positive” that the U.K. government will reinstate the Duke of Sussex’s security
Prince Harry’s fight to have his official, armed full-time security reinstated when he visits the U.K. appears to have taken a step forward.
Insiders tell PEOPLE there are “positive” noises coming from the government regarding a reversal of the decision not to grant Harry security, and they are cautiously hopeful that the decision to upgrade his cover will go ahead.
It follows a report that an official review has found that Harry, 41, meets the criteria for inclusion in the taxpayer-funded security cover.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(686x352:688x354):format(webp)/prince-harry-invictus-engagements-london-010526-689e7d04706d416fbb45a754b512616a.jpg)
Neil Mockford/GC Images
After several years of the Duke of Sussex’s campaigning — including a high-profile court battle which he lost — a full-scale review was granted in December.
That meant an official risk assessment was carried out by the body that draws up the roster for who gets security – the royal and VIP executive committee (Ravec.) Ravec is made up of members of the government’s Home Office, the Metropolitan Police and the royal household.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(999x0:1001x2):format(webp)/Prince-Harry-092025-a3465016e82d44eb91e21f2d9ad9b0cd.jpg)
Prince Harry waves as he departs an engagement in London in Sept. 2025.Suzanne Plunkett – Pool/Getty
On Jan. 4, The Mail on Sunday reported that the committee had found that the criteria for the top-level security measures had been met. A source close to Harry was quoted as saying, “It’s now a formality. Sources at the Home Office have indicated that security is nailed on for Harry.”
There is now a belief that, barring a last-minute intervention from opponents, the duke will be granted the armed guards and institutional backup he used to get when he was a working royal.
Harry has repeatedly said that without such security cover, he is unable to bring his wife, Meghan Markle, 44, and their two children, Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 4, to the country of his birth — insisting he doesn’t feel safe doing so.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(939x465:941x467):format(webp)/Ben-prince-harry-Archie-Lilibet-meghan-030423-01-5c11008582af48af838724db0e5fad8f.jpg)
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle carrying their two children Princess Lilibet, left, and Prince Archie, right, at their former Windsor home, Frogmore Cottage.Netflix/Youtube
This reversal could pave the way for Harry to bring his children, who are being raised in California, to the U.K. to be reunited with his father, King Charles.
It emerged on Oct. 6 that a female stalker came within feet of Prince Harry on a couple of occasions when he was on a charity visit to the U.K. in September 2025.
Harry lost his full security cover when he and Meghan stepped back from frontline royal duties in 2020. In May 2025, he lost an appeal over the issue. It emerged during that case that he and Meghan, 44, and the family had not had an assessment since 2019.
But in October 2025, Harry made another approach, making a personal appeal to the British government minister in charge of policing and crime prevention in Britain, the Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood.
In an interview in May, following the failure of his appeal, Harry implied to the BBC that he believed his father, King Charles, could influence the decision despite the fact that the palace has consistently denied that the King, 77, has the power to have that security reinstated.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(749x0:751x2):format(webp)/meghan-markle-prince-harry-2-111325-2a2dfd4b9aff40998b1b3f3c36afa5ab.jpg)
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry enjoying a night out at at Dodgers Stadium in Oct. 2025.Joe Scarnici/MLB Photos via Getty
Then, in December, the full-scale review of the Duke of Sussex’s security by the official body that assesses how royals and VIPs are guarded commenced.
Harry is due back in the U.K. later this month for a court case over his legal claim against Associated Newspapers, the owners of the publishers of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday and Mail Online.
His spokesman declined to comment, saying they don’t discuss security matters.
A government spokesperson added in a statement, “The UK Government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.”
News
MEGHAN REALLY THINKS SHE’S A FUTURE QUEEN…. Meghan Markle’s list of demands to return to the UK has been revealed — and it immediately shocked the public for being utterly unhinged
Meghan Markle is reportedly considering a return to the UK for the 2027 Invictus Games events, but only under strict security,…
👑 ROYAL SH0CKER! A Will, a Tiara, and the Fury No One Saw Coming…
In monarchies, power is rarely spoken aloud. It is signaled — through seating charts, glances across a room, who walks…
Tests Suggest the Latest ChatGPT Model Is Pulling Information From Elon Musk’s “Grokipedia” — Raising Fresh Questions About Its Training Sources
Guardian found OpenAI’s platform cited Grokipedia on topics including Iran and Holocaust deniers The latest model of ChatGPT has begun…
After Years of Bold Predictions, Elon Musk Once Again Falls Short of His Cybercab and Optimus Vision — Leaving More Questions Than Answers
The Tesla CEO says production on the company’s robotaxis and humanoid robots will be ‘agonizingly slow’ in 2026. [Photos: Tesla]…
Elon Musk Quietly Pulls the Plug on Tesla Autopilot — And It’s Not About Safety
Tesla (TSLA) removed its Autopilot basic self-driving software as a standard feature in the US on new Model Y and…
💥 TIME TO STRIP THE TITLES? A growing storm is building around Prince Harry and Meghan Markle — and this time, the comparisons are unavoidable
A question about power, pain, legacy, and the price of walking away In the United States, the British monarchy often…
End of content
No more pages to load






