Nigel Farage accused the BBC of sinking to ‘new depths’ tonight in a deepening row over the broadcaster’s decision to allow Channel boat migrants to take part in Question Time.

The Reform leader said the corporation was complicit in a ‘set-up job’ after Zia Yusuf, the party’s head of policy, was questioned by a man who had arrived in the UK illegally.

One of the two men told the immigration special hosted by Fiona Bruce that his asylum application had been rejected by six other countries before he came into Britain from Afghanistan. The other man told the show he had travelled from Iran.

Both are understood to have been granted refugee status so have a legal right to be in the country.

But Mr Farage, who has appeared on Question Time himself repeatedly in recent years, said it had  been ‘utterly discredited’ by a stunt designed to ‘get the great British public to sympathise with them’.

“The BBC sunk to new depths last night on their Question Time show, their flagship politics show for over four decades, where they had two audience members who’d illegally come into Britain by boat,’ he added.

It comes after Mr Farage held a dramatic press conference yesterday in which he accused the BBC of ‘double standards’ for reporting claims of schoolboy racism against him, which he denies.

He turned the tables on the broadcaster by pointing out that much of its output in the 1970s and 1980s would be considered racist, sexist and homophobic by today’s standards.

+5
View gallery

The Reform leader said the corporation was complicit in a ‘set-up job’ after Zia Yusuf, the party’s head of policy, was questioned by a man who had arrived in the UK illegally.

+5
View gallery

One of the migrants, from Iran, had asked Mr Yusuf a question which involved reading a statement from his smartphone about how important it was that the UK stayed in the ECHR

The party today escalated its row with the broadcaster following last night’s Question Time programme in which two former self-professed illegal migrants were asked about their views.

Mr Yusuf said that before his appearance, Twitter users had joked that the BBC would probably invite small boat migrants on to the programme.

‘Then, staggeringly, that happened. There were two illegal migrants who’d come originally by small boat. The BBC were very open about that,’ he told GB News.

Following the programme last night, Mr Yusuf tweeted: ‘It is a scandal that licence fee money is being paid to bring to air an ‘immigration special’ where people who literally broke into this country are getting to air their views.

‘What’s next? On Budget day, is the BBC going to bring us the viewpoint of tax evaders? I don’t know where we go from here.’

He said one of the migrants had asked him a question which involved reading a statement from his smartphone about how important it was that the UK stayed in the ECHR.

Mr Yusuf was asked by presenter Fiona Bruce whether he would deport a man who had said he had come from Afghanistan.

The migrant, Ashraf, revealed that his asylum application had been rejected by six other countries before he came into Britain.

He said he had lodged unsucceful asylum claims in Turkey, Macedonia, Serbia, Romania, Austria and Germany.

‘These countries just rejected me and didn’t accept me,’ he said.

Asked why most small boat migrants are men coming without their families, the Afghan said: ‘Everyone knows my country is not safe for us, we have a war of 15 years.

‘We are living in a war, because of that we come here and I just want to live.’

+5
View gallery

Ashraf, from Afghanistan, said his asylum application had been rejected by six other countries before he came into Britain

In response, Mr Yusuf said: ‘I don’t know enough about that individual story but in terms of broad strokes let me be clear, if you are entering a warzone, it’s generally men first and if you are fleeing a warzone it’s generally women and children first and the vast majority of people coming to this country via the English channel illegally are men. That is a statistical fact.

‘And when people talk about language, I don’t know what language they are objecting to. I’m dealing with statistics, I’m dealing with data and I think that’s a sensible way to formulate policy and I think we should use language clearly and accurately.’

Asked about Reform’s policy to deport all illegal migrants within five years, Mr Yusuf added: ‘If you are in this country illegally, let me be crystal clear, if Nigel Farage is the next Prime Minister, you will be deported back to the country to which you came.

‘Over 170,000 people have arrived in this country illegally since 2018, most of that was done by the Tories sadly, and that is more people than arrived on the beaches of Normandy on D-Day.

‘I have used the word invasion before and people might object to that term but the dictionary definition of the word is an unwanted incursion into a space of land and I don’t know what else to describe it as – 170,000 people.

‘Countries they are coming from include Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, not countries which have the British people at heart.’

Mr Yusuf also sparred with an Iranian migrant, who criticised the suggestion of leaving the ECHR.

‘I just want to clear up that leaving the convention [ECHR] doesn’t just affect migrants,’ the Iranian said.

‘It would give ordinary people one less court to protect their rights.

‘The Government would risk the peace settlement in Northern Ireland and damage our security cooperation.’

+5
View gallery

‘What’s next? Tax evaders on Budget day?’ Zia Yusuf rages at BBC after Question Time migrant stunt

Asked if he would be happy to return to Iran if it became safe again, he said: ‘There’s two points. If physically Iran is safe, if there is a regime change, okay that is safe for people like me to go back to Iran.

‘But the second thing is for me, I have a four-month-old daughter, she is born here and growing up here, learning English, learning how to read and write English.

‘She won’t know how to read and write Farsi or even speak Farsi.’

Asked if he would prefer to stay in the UK, he said: ‘Yeah, let’s say after five years, the Government, from Zia – who came originally from a migrant family, can’t tell me to go back to my own country, what will happen to my daughter?’

Mr Yusuf replied: ‘My parents came here legally, they did not come here illegally.

‘There is a clear dividing line in British politics. If you want to vote for a party who will prioritise foreign nationals who came here illegally or do you want to vote for a party that is going to prioritise British citizens who work hard, set their alarm clocks in the evening before going to bed, and toil to pay tax.

‘Do you know how much money the British taxpayer has had to pay for Universal Credit payment alone for foreign nationals last year? That was £10billion. British taxpayers will be spending half the forecast defence budget on Universal Credit alone for foreign nation.’

He later added: ‘How on earth it can be deemed appropriate that people who broke into this country illegally should have a seat at the table?’

Discussing the show, he accused the broadcaster of ‘rigging’ the audience in Dover – which he said would likely fall to Reform if an election was held tomorrow.

It is also the main destination of many of the small boat migrants who cross the Channel.

+5
View gallery

Mr Yusuf was asked by presenter Fiona Bruce whether he would deport a man who had said he had come from Afghanistan

A BBC spokesman said: ‘As immigration continues to be a primary concern for people in the UK, Question Time held a special episode in Dover with panellists from across the political spectrum and a local audience with a range of views and experiences.

‘Over 20 audience members asked questions and contributed to the debate – including two people with direct experience of the asylum system in the UK who have been granted refugee status.

‘As immigration continues to be a primary concern for people in the UK, Question Time held a special episode in Dover with panellists from across the political spectrum and a local audience with a range of views and experiences.

‘Over 20 audience members asked questions and contributed to the debate – including two people with direct experience of the asylum system in the UK who have been granted refugee status.’