In a stunning live broadcast on GB News, Labour leader Keir Starmer erupted in fury after being publicly humiliated by political commentator Patrick Chrystis over a catastrophic U-turn on inheritance tax policy affecting struggling farmers. This explosive confrontation highlights a spiraling crisis 𝓉𝒽𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒾𝓃𝑔 the Prime Minister’s credibility and his party’s grip on power.

On a tense Tuesday afternoon, GB News delivered a bombshell: Starmer’s government has dramatically reversed its controversial inheritance tax hike on family farms, doubling the threshold from £1 million to £2.5 million. The announcement shattered any illusion of fiscal steadiness and 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓮𝓭 deep fractures within the Labour leadership.

The reversal follows months of fierce protests. Farmers, facing unsustainable financial burdens, brought tractors into central London, blocking Westminster and demanding urgent action. Their anger and desperation culminated in a public reckoning with a government that ignored warnings, despite knowing about the devastating personal toll, including tragic suicides linked to the policy.

Prior to the election, Labour’s promises were clear — no new taxes on family farms. Steve Reed, Environment Secretary, guaranteed protection. Yet, upon assuming office, the government reneged, introducing a punitive tax that crushed trust and sparked outrage across rural Britain. This betrayal has left farmers feeling abandoned and betrayed.

Conservative MP Victoria Atkins did not hold back, labeling the government’s conduct as “shameful” and highlighting that concerns from farmers were dismissed for over a year. The government’s figures were wildly inaccurate; while officials claimed 75% of estates wouldn’t be affected, farmers argued every single one would suffer, exposing a dangerous disconnect from reality.

Starmer’s furious reaction to Chrystis’ live critique was unprecedented, revealing the intense pressure mounting behind the scenes. The Prime Minister’s government appears trapped in a cycle of crisis response, with major policy announcements undone weeks later — eroding public faith in Labour’s governing competence.

Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor who crafted and defended the original budget, has mysteriously vanished from the public stage amid the chaos. Reeves’ absence during the unraveling of her fiscal plan adds to the narrative of a fractured cabinet and a leadership struggling to maintain control.

The impact of this tax policy is devastating for farmers, many of whom are asset-rich but cash-poor. Forced to pay high inheritance taxes, they face the painful prospect of selling land passed down for generations, risking the fragmentation of Britain’s agricultural heritage and destabilizing food production.

This debacle also exposes a deeper problem: Labour’s governing style seems increasingly reactive and disorganized. Broken promises, secretive policy changes, and public U-turns suggest a government scrambling for solutions rather than offering visionary leadership, fueling widespread political instability.

The timing of the U-turn raises questions about political calculation. Despite knowing full well the policy’s impact and protests mounting for months, Labour only capitulated when the political cost became unbearable. This suggests a leadership more focused on damage control than principled governance.

The Conservatives have seized this moment, positioning themselves as defenders of the farming community. While their track record is far from flawless, Tories now revel in the opportunity to paint Labour as out of touch and unreliable — a narrative that could shift the political balance ahead of future elections.

At its core, this crisis is about trust — Labour’s biggest casualty. Promises made before the election were broken without remorse. Warnings were ignored until lives were lost. The government’s credibility on fiscal policy lies in tatters, with voters left uncertain whether Labour can be trusted with power.

Patrick Chrystis’ public humiliation of Starmer on live television encapsulates a government on the ropes, struggling to contain a political firestorm of its own making. The fallout from this inheritance tax fiasco will resonate far beyond Westminster, shaping British politics for months to come.

As this story unfolds, the message is clear: Labour must reckon with the consequences of its failed policy and fractured leadership, or risk further damage that could redefine the country’s political landscape. Meanwhile, farmers and rural Britain watch and wait for a government they can actually trust to listen.