Nigel Farage has been reported to the police over claims of falsified election expenses, it has emerged.

A former member of his campaign team has accused the Reform UK leader of falsely reporting local campaign expenses incurred in his Clacton constituency as national party spending in what could amount to a breach of electoral law.

Richard Everett, a former Reform councillor and member of Mr Farage’s campaign team, has reportedly submitted documents to the Metropolitan Police that he claims show an overspend.

A Reform spokesman denied any wrong-doing, claiming the allegations came from a ‘disgruntled former councillor’ who was kicked out of the party.

Documents show that Reform came within £400 of the legal election spending limit of £20,660 in the Essex seaside town.

But Mr Everett claims that figure excludes some costs, including the refurbishment of a blue Reform-themed bar in the campaign office.

He also alleges the party failed to declare the loan of an armoured Land Rover that was used by Mr Farage during a campaign rally on Clacton Pier as a donation.

If Mr Everett’s claims are found to be accurate, Mr Farage and Peter Harris, his election agent, could be found personally liable in court for a breach of electoral law.

+2
View gallery

Nigel Farage (pictured) has been reported to the police over claims of falsified election expenses, it has emerged

Mr Everett – whose role included the monitoring of election expenses and escorting Mr Farage around during the campaign following his defection from the Conservatives – reportedly said he believes Reform exceeded the spending limit by about £9,000, but he added that Mr Farage was ‘blissfully unaware’ of the omissions.

Under electoral law, campaign spending is highly regulated and is divided into expenditure by a national political party and by individual candidates.

National parties have higher spending limits and, while they can buy materials used locally, they must not directly promote a specific candidate using a photograph or the name of a particular area.

It is understood a dossier sent to the Met includes Reform’s official spending submission, photographs of various campaign materials purchased by the party and expenses receipts.

‘Because of my experience as an agent, I’ve done many of these returns myself, so I know what is meant to be on them,’ Mr Everett told The Daily Telegraph.

‘In this particular case, there was a spending limit of £20,660.72. So that’s the amount you’re allowed to spend on the election. In this return that Peter Harris has produced, he says that we spent £20,299.80.

‘I do not think that that is an accurate figure. The reason why I think that is because of a number of items that were either missing on the return or wrong on the return.’

Tory chairman Kevin Hollinrake called for a ‘full investigation’ into the allegations, adding: ‘We all have an obligation to play by the rules to ensure that our elections are free and fair.

+2
View gallery

If Mr Everett’s claims are found to be accurate, Mr Farage and Peter Harris, his election agent, could be found personally liable in court for a breach of electoral law

‘Clearly, there must now be a full investigation by the Electoral Commission and the police to establish the facts and ensure whether or not Farage and the Reform Party have followed the law.’

The Metropolitan Police did not immediately confirm it had received the report.

A Reform spokesman said: ‘These inaccurate claims come from a disgruntled former councillor. The party was disgusted by his inappropriate sexual behaviour with women and he was expelled several months ago.’ Mr Everett denies the claims.

The spokesman added: ‘The party denies breaking electoral law. We look forward to clearing our name.’