“I am innocent.”

With those three words, a hijacked building committee member has stepped into the center of one of South Africa’s most closely watched murder investigations — and forcefully rejected claims linking her to the killing of DJ Warras, real name Warrick Stock.

But as she denies any involvement, police are making it clear: the case is far from over.

A Denial That Changes the Shape of the Story

The woman, whose name has circulated widely online and in political whispers, says she has been unfairly dragged into a tragedy that has already devastated a family and shocked a community. According to her, the allegations tying her to DJ Warras’ murder are baseless, reckless, and fueled by speculation rather than fact.

She insists she had no role — direct or indirect — in the shooting that took Stock’s life.

Yet her decision to speak out has only intensified scrutiny, not quieted it.

Because investigators are not dismissing the broader context surrounding the case.

The Building at the Center of Everything

Police sources have confirmed that disputes linked to a hijacked building remain a live line of inquiry. It is an uncomfortable detail that refuses to fade: in the weeks before his death, DJ Warras was reportedly involved in tensions connected to the property — tensions serious enough, according to reports, for him to seek protection.

This is where the narrative becomes murkier.

While no formal charges have been laid against the committee member, authorities have also stopped short of clearing anyone connected to the building outright. Officers say the investigation is focused on networks, influence, and motive — not just the individual who pulled the trigger.

“This Is Bigger Than One Person”

Behind the scenes, investigators are said to be examining whether the murder was spontaneous or calculated, isolated or orchestrated. The questioning of multiple individuals in recent days has only reinforced the sense that police believe the truth lies in a wider web of relationships.

The committee member’s denial, while firm, exists alongside a reality where silence, power struggles, and competing interests may all intersect.

As one source close to the investigation put it: “This is bigger than one person — and bigger than one night.”

Online Fury vs. Legal Reality

On social media, the reaction has been immediate and volatile. Some have rallied behind the woman’s declaration of innocence, warning against trial-by-internet. Others argue that the denial raises more questions than answers, pointing to unresolved issues around the building and who stood to lose — or gain — from DJ Warras’ actions.

Police, however, are urging restraint.

They stress that speculation risks undermining the investigation, while confirming that no theory has been ruled out.

A Case Still Unfolding

What makes this moment so pivotal is not just the denial itself, but its timing. The investigation is accelerating. Statements are being compared. Timelines are being rebuilt. And authorities are carefully navigating a case that appears to touch on crime, property, influence, and fear.

For now, the committee member says she wants the truth to come out — confident it will clear her name.

Police say they want the same thing.

But until every question is answered, DJ Warras’ murder remains a story defined not by certainty — but by tension, denial, and the growing sense that the full truth has yet to surface.

And when it does, it may unsettle far more people than anyone expects.

SOURCE: https://www.news24.com/southafrica/crime-and-courts/hijacked-building-committee-member-rejects-claims-linking-her-to-dj-warras-murder-20251218-1172