Inside James Bulger's Murder By Robert Thompson And Jon Venables

 

“Liverpool 38”: The Tragedy of James Bulger and the Chilling Indifference That Shocked Britain

James Bulger's father says he 'will not rest' until he has 'exposed' his son's killer's new identity | Daily Mail Online

Liverpool, England — The phrase “Liverpool 38” may sound like the name of a street or postcode, but for millions, it is a haunting reminder of one of the most shocking crimes in British history. It refers to the 1993 murder of James Bulger, a three-year-old boy lured away from his mother, brutally tortured, and killed — not by adults, but by two ten-year-old boys.

The Day James Disappeared

James Bulger's brother says killer must die in prison as he speaks of anguish 30 years on | UK | News | Express.co.uk

On February 12, 1993, Denise Bulger took her son James to the New Strand Shopping Centre in Bootle, Liverpool. While she was briefly distracted in a butcher’s shop, James wandered a few feet away. Within seconds, he was approached by Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, both aged just ten.

What began as a casual encounter quickly spiraled into an abduction that would horrify a nation. The boys coaxed James out of the mall, leading him by the hand. Security cameras captured the moment James was led away — images that would later become seared into Britain’s memory.

The Walk Through Liverpool

Over the next two and a half miles, the two boys walked James through Liverpool, across busy streets and public places. Witnesses saw the trio together, but few thought to intervene.

Some passersby noticed James was crying or had a bump on his forehead. Others assumed Thompson and Venables were his older brothers. At least 38 people reportedly saw James being escorted by the two boys, but none stopped them or alerted police.

This chilling lack of action gave rise to the phrase “Liverpool 38” — a reference to the bystanders who unknowingly let a nightmare unfold before their eyes.

The Brutal Murder

Thompson and Venables eventually led James to a disused railway line near Walton. There, the crime turned unspeakably violent. The boys threw stones, bricks, and beat James with an iron bar. Reports later revealed James suffered over 40 injuries.

In a shocking detail, the boys placed batteries into James’s mouth and, according to some evidence, other parts of his body. Finally, they left him on the tracks, where his body was later struck by a train, making the discovery appear at first like a tragic accident.

James Bulger was just three years old.

National Shock and Outrage

When police discovered that the killers were themselves children, the nation recoiled in horror. Thompson and Venables became the youngest convicted murderers in modern British history.

The trial, held at Preston Crown Court, transfixed the nation. Both boys were found guilty of abduction and murder. Their faces were made public, an unusual step given their age, because the court judged the crime so serious it warranted full transparency.

The judge described their actions as “unparalleled evil.”

The Meaning of “Liverpool 38”

While the savagery of the crime was shocking enough, public anger also turned toward the community. How could 38 people see a distressed toddler with two strangers and do nothing?

Sociologists and psychologists later pointed to the “bystander effect” — a phenomenon where individuals are less likely to help when others are present, assuming someone else will act.

In Britain, “Liverpool 38” has since become shorthand for a collective moral failure, a chilling reminder of the consequences of apathy and inaction.

Aftermath and Legacy

James Bulger's dad blasts Jon Venables' sentence and begs authorities to strip him of his new identity before he claims more victims | The Sun

Thompson and Venables were sentenced to detention until they turned 18, then released in 2001 with new identities. The decision sparked outrage, as many believed the punishment was too lenient for the brutality of the crime.

Venables would later reoffend, being imprisoned for child pornography charges, reigniting debates about rehabilitation versus justice.

For James’s mother, Denise Bulger (later Denise Fergus), the pain has never faded. She has spoken for decades about her grief and her fight to keep James’s memory alive.

Lessons That Still Haunt

More than thirty years later, the James Bulger case continues to spark debate about the nature of evil, childhood responsibility, and societal duty. Could such a tragedy have been prevented if just one of the “Liverpool 38” had intervened?

The story remains a cautionary tale: about the vulnerability of children, the darkness that can exist even in the very young, and the dangers of looking away when something doesn’t seem right.

For many in the UK, James Bulger’s name is synonymous with innocence lost. For others, “Liverpool 38” is a permanent reminder that sometimes silence and inaction can be as damning as the crime itself.

The Enduring Symbol

The haunting CCTV image of James being led away, tiny hand held by his killers, remains one of the most chilling symbols in British criminal history.

“Liverpool 38” is not just about one crime — it has become a phrase woven into the national consciousness, warning future generations of the cost of indifference.

As Denise Fergus has said in countless interviews: “If just one person had stopped them, my James might still be here today.”