Tensions within the British royal family have reportedly reached a boiling point once again, with insiders claiming that Meghan Markle is privately seething over the rumored decision to pass Princess Diana’s legendary Spencer Tiara to Princess Catherine’s daughter, Princess Charlotte.

The Spencer Tiara, a breathtaking diamond and pearl heirloom valued at approximately $535,000, has long been one of the most symbolically charged pieces in the royal collection. Originally commissioned in the late 19th century for the Spencer family, it was famously worn by Diana on her wedding day in 1981, cementing its status as a powerful emblem of her legacy, independence, and enduring popularity. After Diana’s tragic death in 1997, the tiara returned to the Spencer estate before being loaned back to the royal family for select occasions. Its future has been the subject of quiet speculation for years.

According to multiple palace sources speaking on condition of anonymity, the tiara is now being positioned as an inheritance for Princess Charlotte, the second child of Prince William and Princess Catherine. At just 10 years old, Charlotte is already viewed as a future pillar of the monarchy, and the decision to earmark such an iconic piece for her is seen by many as a deliberate affirmation of the Wales branch’s central role in the line of succession.

The news, which first surfaced in royal circles late last year and gained traction in early 2026, has allegedly left Meghan Markle deeply upset. Insiders close to the Duchess of Sussex claim she was “furious” upon hearing the details, interpreting the move as a pointed exclusion of her own daughter, Princess Lilibet, who turns 5 in June 2026. One source described Meghan’s reaction in stark terms: “She reportedly asked, ‘How dare they forget Lilibet?’ in private conversations, feeling the choice sends a clear message that her children are being sidelined from key symbols of royal heritage.”

The Spencer Tiara carries more than monetary value; it represents continuity, maternal legacy, and the weight of public affection for Diana. For Meghan, who has often spoken about the importance of family and inclusion, the rumored decision is said to feel like a deliberate snub—particularly given the ongoing estrangement between the Sussexes and the Waleses since their 2020 departure from royal duties. The rift, fueled by explosive interviews, memoir revelations, and differing approaches to public life, has shown no signs of healing.

Behind closed doors, the Palace is reportedly buzzing with tension. While King Charles III has remained publicly neutral, sources suggest the choice of Charlotte as the tiara’s future wearer aligns with the King’s desire to strengthen the core line of succession and honor Diana’s memory through her grandchildren in the direct line. Queen Camilla, who has worn the Spencer Tiara on several occasions herself, is understood to have supported the idea, further complicating dynamics.

Meghan and Prince Harry have not commented publicly on the reports, but the Sussex camp is said to view the development as another example of unequal treatment. Supporters of the couple argue that Lilibet, as a granddaughter of the late Princess Diana, should be considered equally for such heirlooms, while critics maintain that inheritance decisions naturally prioritize those closest to the throne.

The Spencer Tiara saga underscores how deeply symbols matter in the modern monarchy. In a family where jewels often speak louder than words, this single piece may have reignited old wounds and drawn fresh battle lines. As the Wales children grow into their roles and the Sussex children come of age across the Atlantic, questions of legacy, inclusion, and fairness will only grow louder.

For now, the tiara remains in the royal vaults, its future uncertain—but its power to divide is undeniable.