During the final arguments in the trial surrounding the killing of rapper Julio Foolio, prosecutor Scott Harmon delivered one of the most forceful presentations since the proceedings began, declaring that “nothing can save them” in reference to the defendants and urging the jury to impose the death penalty on each person involved.

According to the prosecution, the attack that killed Julio Foolio was not a spontaneous act or a moment of lost control, but a carefully orchestrated plan prepared weeks in advance. Harmon emphasized the extremely high level of premeditation, arguing that the defendants deliberately tracked the victim, arranged lodging and transportation, and coordinated their actions like a “tactical team” to carry out the deadly ambush.

During his presentation to the jury, the prosecutor repeatedly relied on surveillance footage, phone data, and digital evidence to reconstruct the events leading up to and following the shooting. According to the state, Sean Gathright, Rashad Murphy, Isaiah Chance, and Da’Von Murphy worked together in an organized manner to monitor Foolio’s movements before carrying out the attack.

Video footage from the scene and related locations allegedly showed the group traveling together, making preparations, and maintaining constant communication before the shooting occurred. Harmon argued that this was not random behavior, but a coordinated operation in which each individual played a specific role.

One of the central points in the prosecution’s argument involved rejecting mitigation claims related to the defendants’ mental health. Harmon argued that the actions taken before the crime — including searching for Airbnbs, purchasing supplies, tracking the target, and coordinating the gunfire — demonstrated a high level of planning and awareness. According to him, those actions proved the defendants fully understood what they were doing and willingly participated in the murder plot.

The prosecutor also highlighted the severe consequences the shooting created for innocent bystanders who were present at the scene. According to testimony presented in court, Kamia Bentley and several others were placed in life-threatening danger when numerous rounds were fired in a crowded area. Harmon described the incident as a reckless barrage of gunfire carried out with complete disregard for human life.

In the closing moments of his argument, Harmon made a powerful assertion that the brutality of the crime, the extensive planning involved, and what he characterized as the defendants’ lack of remorse made the death penalty an appropriate punishment. He urged jurors to consider the full scope of the preparation, coordination, and devastating consequences of the attack when reaching their final decision.

The trial connected to Julio Foolio’s death continues to attract widespread attention across social media and national media outlets as witness testimony, evidence, and closing arguments become public. Many observers following the case described Scott Harmon’s presentation as one of the most intense and significant moments of the proceedings, particularly when he emphasized that, in the prosecution’s view, “nothing can save” the defendants from the harshest possible sentence.