Peter Sullivan is one of the most shocking wrongful conviction cases in the UK, having finally been released after 38 years in prison. He was originally convicted of murder in 1987 in connection with the death of 21-year-old Diane Sindall, who was brutally attacked in Merseyside in 1986.

After decades of fighting to prove his innocence, Sullivan’s conviction was finally quashed in May 2025 when new DNA evidence showed that the biological material collected from the crime scene did not match him. This breakthrough came thanks to advances in forensic science that were not available during the original investigation.

The harrowing details of Sullivan’s interrogation have also come to light. He claims that he was subjected to brutal police treatment: a blanket was thrown over his head, he was beaten with batons, and he was denied legal support throughout the process. Officers allegedly threatened him with accusations of other crimes if he did not “cooperate,” and he was refused food and rest during questioning.

Significantly, Sullivan has a learning disability, which made him particularly vulnerable during these interrogations. Despite this, he was not provided with an appropriate adult to support him—a legal safeguard intended for people with cognitive impairments. This oversight contributed to his coerced confession and wrongful imprisonment.

Following the overturning of his conviction, Merseyside Police acknowledged the gravity of the mistake and reopened the investigation into Diane Sindall’s murder. More than 260 suspects have since been eliminated from consideration, but the real perpetrator has not yet been identified.

Although finally free, Sullivan carries the weight of decades lost. His mother died while he was in prison, and his father passed away before he could see his release. Sullivan has called for an official apology from the police and hopes to understand how such a miscarriage of justice could have occurred.

He also expresses empathy toward Diane Sindall’s family, saying that he is willing to cooperate with any ongoing legal process to help find the real killer.

Sullivan’s case highlights serious flaws in the criminal justice system, including the use of controversial forensic evidence, the vulnerability of individuals with cognitive impairments during interrogations, and the need for effective mechanisms to review wrongful convictions.

Ultimately, his story demonstrates how advances in science, such as DNA testing, can overturn decades of injustice and provide hope for those who have been forgotten by the legal system. Yet it also raises a troubling question: how many other innocent people are still suffering in silence?